Subversed

We've been talking to someone who has genuinely changed the way we think about our own dynamic. We wanted to bring you into the conversation.

Her name is Julie Harris. She's a relationship scientist, and she created something she calls Conscious Relationship Design. The short version: she takes the way designers approach a hard problem and points it at the relationship itself.

Now, Meghan here, because I have to make this part personal for a second. Last issue I left you with a knot I hadn't untied: how do you hold two versions of yourself with the same person, the sub who exhales when he takes control and the co-founder who runs the meeting, without one of them swallowing the other. I told you I didn't have a system for it. I still don't, not a tidy one. But somewhere in these conversations, the knot started to loosen.

Here's the shape of it. You move through a cycle together. You start by really listening to each other. The kind of listening where you find out what your person actually wants, not what you assumed they wanted. Then you name it out loud. Then you let yourselves dream a little, brainstorm the possibilities you'd normally talk yourself out of. Then you try one. A small thing, a prototype, low stakes. And then you come back together and look at how it felt. What worked, what didn't. And then you go around again, a little deeper each time.

Your dynamic isn't something you set up once and defend forever. It's something you keep designing, on purpose, together.

The piece that actually loosened the knot was something Julie said about defaults. When you slip back into an old habit, an old role, the version of yourself you were trying to move past, that slip isn't a failure to punish. It's data. It's the dynamic telling you something it needs.

I sat with that for a while. Because it landed right on top of the thing I'd been struggling with. That moment in the meeting when I felt myself shift out of one role and into another, the moment I read at the time as me getting it wrong, was never a failure. It was information for the next iteration. The design showing us where the edges actually are, instead of where we'd assumed they were.

That reframe quietly changes everything downstream. If a slip is data, then the check-in where you talk about it stops feeling like getting called into the principal's office and starts feeling like something you'd actually want to do. Rob and I have started treating ours more like a date than a meeting. Sounds small. It isn't.

You negotiate from what you each want, not from who's supposed to be in charge of deciding. The rituals and rewards you land on are ones you built together. And the notes you keep, the shared space where your dynamic lives, stop being a one-time setup you fill in and forget. They become a workspace you come back to as the two of you change. Because you will change, and the design should get to change with you.

We loved Julie's framework so much that we built a Task Kit around it in the app, so you can try a round of the cycle yourselves without inventing the scaffolding from scratch. But the ideas are hers, and they're worth going to the source for. We just got to sit in the room and feel something we'd been circling for a while start to come undone.

So here's what we'd love to know. How have you designed, or redesigned, your own dynamic? When you slipped back into an old default, did you ever get to treat it as data instead of a failure? Reach out on Reddit, Discord, FetLife or social, or just hit reply. We read every one, and we're still figuring this out alongside you.

Come say hi

Subversed is the newsletter from SubTasks  ·  subtasksapp.com

MayeTone LLC  ·  1123 Locust St, Ste 347, St Louis, MO 63101
Questions? hello@subtasksapp.com

Subscribe to Subversed